The Racked Focus Review: Journey 2: The Mysterious Island (2012)
Since this is the first of this recurring blog post, I will
explain what the overall concept of it is.
The Racked Focus is a website created by Maxwell Haddad and Nathan
Donarum. On the site, they both review
and write about some of the many movies that get released into theaters or onto
home video. It is a site that I
frequently read, if I have seen the movies.
I don’t tend to read reviews of movies that I haven’t seen. In this post, I shall be reviewing one of
their reviews, writings, or musings.
That is right. I will be
reviewing their reviews. Let’s get this
thing started.
On February 17, 2012, Maxwell published a review of Journey2: The Mysterious Island. This review
praised certain aspects but criticized others.
That was to be expected due to the fact that it was a review, and Max is
a critic. That is how criticism
works. The reviewer will give their
thoughts about the positives and negatives of the subject at hand. People will then read these thoughts and
agree or disagree with them.
Maxwell Haddad took some time to explain the background of
Journey 2: The Mysterious Island. His
opening paragraph revealed the intricacies of the plot and how it was derived
from various sources, including the titular The Mysterious Island, as well as
novels such as Treasure Island, and Gulliver’s Travels. Max’s use of italics to denote all of the
titles was aesthetically pleasing to the eye and gave a sense of direction to
his writing. Separating the titles from
the rest of the review could have been very confusing if not for this touch of
the author.
The review continued forward, now choosing to discuss the
underlying elements of the plot. Mr.
Haddad chose to direct the attention of his readers to the relationship drama
between stepfather/stepson and grandfather/stepfather. The way that the review analyzed each of
these aspects added to the understanding of what the movie was trying to convey
in these plot threads. This was also the portion of the review when
each actor was mentioned alongside their characters. Maxwell wove the names in with great ease,
making it easy to comprehend which actor portrayed which character, and the
characters’ roles throughout the film. The
major issue with this section, however, was one sentence in which Maxwell
placed five different commas. A little
bit of quick editing could have easily made this sentence flow better and not
stand out as a comma filled monstrosity.
There was a great prose that Maxwell used throughout his
review, especially while he contemplated the pleasurable aesthetics of the film
he had watched. He mentioned the
direction of the film while also taking note of his so-so liking of the effects
throughout.
Maxwell finally finished out his review with a slanderous
paragraph about how juvenile he felt the film was. There was not much to take from the
paragraph, aside from the fact that Max had a thing for Vanessa Hudgens. He may have even been a little obsessed with
her body. A statement about how beautiful
he found her to be was separated from the rest of the paragraph by a set of parentheses. If he had not gone right back into the review
following this sidetrack, I might have thought that he was distracted from the
movie because he was busy eye-fondling her.
The review came to an end with Maxwell’s rating of Journey
2: The Mysterious Island. He gave his
final thoughts on the film and scored it out of a total score of five. The problem with his scoring was that Max did
not state what it was out of five of.
What did the number represent?
Was it five pecans? Was it five
dogs urinating on fire hydrants? The
review was left open-ended by not describing what the number five meant. There is no way to accurately gage the score
when there is no knowledge of what the total could be. (Edit: the rating has since been removed, due to it being a residual from the older version of the website. I like the paragraph too much to remove it, so you get this edit for a notice.)
There was a lot to like about the review that Maxwell Haddad
wrote. He had an eloquent way with his
words that brought intelligence and a straight forward stream of thought to the
review. The review had a clear direction
throughout, and served to get the readers thinking about Journey 2: The
Mysterious Island. It was a good job,
all around.
Score: 4 giant bees out of a possible 5 giant bees.
Comments
Post a Comment